Louis County, Missouri, population schedule, 3rd Ward, City of St.

(handwritten, stamped), dwelling, family, NARA microfilm publication M432, roll. census, County,, population schedule,, p. NARA microfilm publication M432, roll 414. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.ġ850 U.S. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d. I found this example suggested by the Saint Louis Genealogical Society. census, population schedule. Database with images. sch., Whitley City, ED 0002, sheet 10B, dwell. census, McCreary County, Kentucky, population schedule, Whitley City, enumeration district (ED) 0002, sheet 10B, dwelling 183, family 184, Herman Worley database with images, FamilySearch ( : accessed ) citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm T626, roll 765 FHL microfilm: 2340500ġ930 U.S. So if we take away all the minor differences between the census years a good citation might look like:ġ930 U.S. Then you have the book examples in chapter 6 which show several examples: Microfilm, Online. Layer 3: We cite the basic details that our provider gives us for its source.Layer 2: We cite the website and its database.We don’t cite details that we can’t see for ourselves, to ensure that they are accurate.

Layer 1: We cite the image of the original document.When we’re citing an imaged record at a site such as Ancestry, we have three layers.

Each layer of the citation deals with a different entity. I was reading the 1911 England census article where you state:īasic Rule for Creating a Layered Citation for Imaged Recordsĭetails that belong in one layer of the citation should not be mixed into the other. So these online providers are pretty much the best I can do. While I would love to travel to all these amazing locations where so much data is held, it is just not that easy. I am a 100% Permanent & Totally Disabled Veteran, so it I do 95% of my research from home using, ,, etc. I am on my fifth reading or so of your book and every time I read it or read through your blog, I seem to only get more confused.

Rootsmagic and ancestry com